The U.S. Naval Institute is maintaining and preserving the former Naval Historical Foundation website so readers and former NHF members can still access past issues of Pull Together and other content. NHF has decommissioned and is no longer accepting new members or donations. NHF members are being converted to members of the Naval Institute. If you have questions, please contact the Naval Institute via email at [email protected] or by phone at 800-233-8764.Not a member of the Naval Institute? Here’s how to join!

BOOK REVIEW – Subs, Guns, Honor: Lt. W. H. Jaques of Little Boar’s Head, NH

By Thomas C. Clark, CreateSpace Independent Publishing (2017)

Reviewed by Charles Bogart

Who was Lt. William Henry Jaques and why write a book about him? How about the fact that in 1896, upon the election of William McKinley as President of the United States, W. H. Jaques was the odds-on favorite to be Assistant Secretary of the Navy in the McKinley Administration, not Teddy Roosevelt. It was only due to political deal-making by those supporting Teddy Roosevelt that Jacques lost his bid for this office. Jaques was, therefore, a man who almost changed American political and military history. How Jaques rose to this height of national political popularity in 1896, only to become today a forgotten footnote in U.S. history, is the heart of this book.

Jaques, sometimes spelled Jacques, graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1867. He would become internationally known during the years leading up to World War I as an innovating ordnance engineer and naval architect. He served from 1880 to 1885 as the Navy’s Assistant Inspector of Ordnance, Secretary to the U.S. Senate Committee on Ordnance, and as a member of the Gun Foundry Board. In 1886, he left the Navy and went to Bethlehem Steel where he worked to perfect modern ship armor. Here he introduced the United States to fluid compression and the hydraulic forging of steel. In 1894, Jaques left Bethlehem Steel and did consulting work for Japan for which he received the Order of the Rising Sun. By 1895, Jaques’ interest had expanded to include torpedoes and submarines and, in that year, he became Commander New Jersey Naval Reserves.  In 1897, Jaques became President of the Holland Torpedo Boat Company and helped perfect the Holland Submarine. He did not see service during the Spanish American War but used the war to promote the development of submarines and torpedo boats.

The years between 1900 and 1916 saw Jaques investigating subjects beyond naval engineering. Among the topics he researched was the use of solar power. In his spare time, he was the Hampton Water Works Company’s engineer and served on the Board of Visitors to the Naval Academy. In 1916, he traveled to England for unknown reasons and shortly after arrival was killed by a train under circumstances never resolved.

Overall, the book is an interesting and educational read of a Victorian-era American engineer; however, it suffers from the fact that the author based most of the biographical story on secondary sources. The book could have used an editor to keep the text focused on Jaques, as it is peppered with items of interest that are not central to the story. Footnotes should have recorded these non-pertinent facts. In addition, the book needs an index. Despite these quibbles, the book is a fascinating look at American naval engineering at the end of the 19th century.

Charles H. Bogart is a frequent contributor to Naval History Book Reviews.

Spread the word. Share this post!


  1. Tom Clarie (author)

    The author appreciates the time and thought reviewer Charles H. Bogart put into his comments. Funny that a former university reference librarian (Mr. Clarie) would purposely exclude footnotes and an index — and Mr. Clarie fully intended not to put in a bibliography either, only relenting when he decided to push and pray hard that the Naval Institute Press would publish his book as an interesting overview of naval power as well as a study of little-known Lt. Jaques. Thank God I did put in the bibliography, because it represents the minimum of sources I used — probably used 3 times the sources listed. As an ex-librarian, I feared a huge index, bibliography, and massive footnoting would destroy any narrative feel of the book. I was hoping citing sources as I went would get by, and I know many scholars toss a book in the garbage if it is not footnoted. I wanted this book to concentrate on NAVY, Jaques, NAVY, an age of invention, NAVY, NAVY, NAVY. I came to realize late in doing the book how dramatically important the U. S. Navy has been throughout history. The book came to be perhaps less on Lt. Jaques and more and more an Ode to the Navy. Maybe THAT should have been its title? I in great humility thank Reviewer Bogart for having the courage and daring to tackle my odd little book that I have come to love so much.

Comments are closed.